Borgmann’s Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life :: Philosophy Religion Essays

Borgmanns Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life The use of this paper is to demonstrate Borgmanns theory of focal things in exertion to Siamese Chi, as well as propose the opposition to it with an ferment machine as a device in the context of Borgmanns Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. In addition, I will adjudicate to argue that the resolution to the bifurcation between things and devices is a specific kind of equilibrium.First, Tai Chi, the old Chinese wile that is a culmination of m dodgeial art and a form of exercise for both body and mind, fits into Borgmanns explanation of a focal thing. He states that focal things are inconspicuous and humble, disunited and of yesterday, and they flourish at the margins of public attention, (199). Tai Chi is humble, in that its promontory focus is not self-defense, but a fortification of the bodys general well- creation. It is inconspicuous because it is not something that people boast about, and it i s not something which is as widely known of while at the same time being something which is practiced by many, in small groups, or in privacy, or at hours during which the technological world is quiet. Thus, it is also scattered, as it is practiced by people al lover the world, and in the most mundane of measure and places. Tai Chi is of yesterday, as it is an art which has its origins hundreds of years ago, and only those who defecate come to a maturity of thought within them see the rightful(a) value in it and have the patience to do it. The practice is not glamorized by the entertainment industry, and is not a high point of polemical debate. It is not in the focus of the media, and so it is at the margins of public attention.Also, Borgmann goes raise to say that things neither rival nor deny technology, and that they attain a saucily splendor in todays technological context, (200). So too, the art of Tai Chi does not impose a clean clay of rules for technology to fun ction under, and so does not rival it. It has no direction to the negativity of technology, in which it does not deny it.The practice attains a new splendor in todays technological context, in that it provides residue from a technologically stressful existence, and promotes ones well-being (200).